In his petition for certiorari filed with the Supreme Court, Atty. Dizon alleged that Atty. Padilla, a legal researcher in the Court of Appeals, drafted the assailed Decision; that he is ignorant of the applicable laws; and that he should be disbarred.
Can Atty. Dizon, in castigating Atty. Padilla, be held liable for unethical conduct against the Court of Appeals? 5%
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
LEGALPASSION.COM
INSTRUCTIONS:
Use this website to share your legal mind. Please feel free to post your Suggested Answers to these Bar Questions. You can also view and response to the opinions of others.
Keywords
- acquiescence (1)
- affidavit (1)
- Affidavit of Self-Adjudication (1)
- assumpsit (1)
- attorney-client privilege (1)
- automatic disbarment (1)
- Client Refuse to Pay His Lawyer in Full (1)
- contingent fee (1)
- Does Not Believe in the Position of the Client (1)
- Exorbitant Appearance Fees (1)
- Grounds for Disbarment (1)
- Ignorant of the Applicable Laws (1)
- Information Charging Arson (1)
- Law Profession (1)
- Law Student (1)
- Officer of the Court (1)
- Practicing Lawyer (1)
- primary duties (1)
- Prosecutor Failed to Reappear in Family Court (1)
- Senior Citizen Lawyer (1)
- Suspended Lawyer (1)
- Trial Lawyer (1)
1 comment:
VI.
Yes. The Code of Professional Responsibility provides that a lawyer shall not, in his professional dealings, use language which is abusive, offensive or otherwise improper. Atty. Dizon’s allegations are personal in nature and have no place in a petition for certiorari.
Post a Comment